Agents and networking
May. 13th, 2006 09:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I was taken on by my agent (Shawna McCarthy) some time before we met. I found her through Locus and she was the first agent I queried. Because I'm based in the UK, the possibility of networking in the States was not feasible. I was also published in the US some considerable time before I met anyone from Asimov's or F&SF or Bantam, my US publishers. I still have never met the main men behind Night Shade.
I have not found Worldcon, in particular, to be all that useful as either a networking or a marketing enterprise (and I am fairly gregarious). WFC may be a different kettle of publishers. I won't be going to LA this year because I don't think the financial outlay justifies the results.
You know, I may be naive about all this...but the biggest thing for me is this: just write as well as you can. And send it out! If you're good, someone is going to notice you. This is the ethos that my (RL, based in the UK) writing group has espoused. One of us has just been up for the Clarke's. Another one is on the NYT best seller list. 4 (IIRC) members of the group, which numbers 9 people, have had stories published regularly in Asimov's, InterZone and Realms, stories that get mentioned in the Years' Best lists and the Locus lists. None of those people (apart from myself, now, in the UK) network all that much, because they have families and work commitments.
But they do write damn good stories.
And - this is worth pointing out, though I'm sure it doesn't apply to anyone here - there are a few people who seem to feel that because they network, it's purely a matter of time before they get published. (I know of a handful of cases of genuine nepotism, which ultimately crash when the person involved can't seem to get published anywhere else). I've watched people on the UK scene plug away year after year, to no avail, and they get very bitter about it. And what publishers say about them is: their work is just not up to it. This is a harsh profession (relatively speaking, I mean - to listen to some people, you'd think it was coal mining or bomb disposal) and anyone who comes into it with a sense of entitlement is going to be in for a short, sharp shock.
Here endeth the lecture. Do feel free to disagree!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 02:11 am (UTC)Everything you said goes for me, too. Even the bit about getting an American agent who sold books for me before we ever met (other than via email or on the phone).
no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 02:16 am (UTC)It is useful to go and visit your US publisher's office every so often. Because then you'll get the guided tour and meet all sorts of interesting and useful people who don't go to conventions, like your book designer and your editor's assistants and the marketing assistant who handles your books. All of whom may put more effort into working on a project for someone they know (ideally, for someone they view as a friend) than for a stranger they've never met -- as is human nature.
But from the UK or Australia, it's expensive to make that kind of trip and hard to justify it on spec.
(My approach is to pick a convention within relative spitting distance of NYC -- say, Boskone in Boston -- then do the con, with a side-trip to NYC to visit my agent and Ace and Tor's offices, as both publish me. Combining a con with two editorial visits and a meeting with my agent begins to make it look cost-effective.)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-14 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-14 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 03:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 03:59 am (UTC)Because of family and work commitments, I can only make it to one or two SF cons a year. This coming WisCon will be my first US con and in fact first trip to the US. It's good to know that I don't have to spend my time hunting down any agents who might be present in an attempt to persuade them to take me on and that I should just let the novel speak for itself. *g*
no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 08:51 am (UTC)And I have a surefire method for networking in the flesh: just hang around in an active local sf fandom, and meet people who aren't working in the field yet. Note that trying to narrow this down, to ignore the ones who will never count, won't work -- because some of the most improbable people will turn out to be winners, and some of the obvious winners will turn out to be losers.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-13 04:53 pm (UTC)Networking before you have a cart...or a horse
Date: 2006-05-13 07:29 pm (UTC)Oh yeah--and *then* even when you *do* get that right, some idiot will come along and call you a commercial sell-out for doing the leverage/PR, even if you just wrote a novel composed entirely of musical notes and random bits of punctuation.
Cheers,
JeffV
Re: Networking before you have a cart...or a horse
Date: 2006-05-14 01:47 am (UTC)Absolutely - this is the business of you-can't-win. Once you get published, you realise how much you've got to do for yourself in terms of publicity.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-14 10:38 am (UTC)